Reading AL Kennedy’s quirky yet oh-so-competent
words about receiving proofs to revise – the last chance to make sure your work, words and your book stacks up – holds a particular resonance for me today.
Proofs of my lil’ book are due to arrive at Bateman HQ today or yesterday, depending on how fast the FedEx man can run. (he’s obviously had a few hot cross buns, because he’s slow this week)
Last. Final. Conclusion.
End. No more chances to meddle with what goes out into the big wide world.
Eeeeek!
As an editor I am usually interested to see if the proofs of the book are faithful to what I see onscreen. It’s an opportunity to find any lurking text errors and stray design elements that have decided to become unruly. Proofs can be the last time I will actually look at a book properly. Even when the advances come in, I can only just have quick flicks through; checking that everything is where it should be, before I send them out to the people who need to see them.
(This is where the oft-used simile of book production being like a pregnancy stumbles, falls and does not stand up. Ideally, parental interest in offspring doesn’t taper off at the moment of birth. Yet it is a very rare book that can win back an editor’s attention within the first few months – and even years – of publication).
As an editor, there’s always another book around the corner – you’ve probably been working intently on at least 3 other books by the time the proofs turn up, and by the time the book is published, you’ve possibly even forgotten the premise of the book.
But as an author, this is it.
This is my last chance to decide whether or not I want my name on the cover of the book. For months I had been deliberating. If my name was Sheryl I wouldn’t have a problem. But I am gifted with not only an unusual first name (thanks Mum and your beatnik ways), but also an odd surname (thanks random Irish ancestor who relocated to Scotland then the antipodes).
It was a subject of debate for my colleagues and my friends. Should I use a pseudonym (
Wendy S Dale, Brie N Vogels being two of the more lateral thinking examples), a nom de plume, or not have the author mentioned at all?
As I wrote the book, however, it became apparent that I couldn’t be a detached author, I’d have to put some name to it, even if it wasn’t my own. But nothing seemed to sit right.
And then, over a couple of glasses of wine, my friend Anna (who is today heading off to immerse herself in a vivid life in Buenos Aires) made the very reasonable statement, “Well, if you don’t have your name to it, you shouldn’t be doing it.”
(A valid point, Anna. Your clarity of thinking certainly gives you an edge as a designer, and I reckon you’d make an amazing lawyer, too. But in the meantime – enjoy whatever adventures await you in the city of fair winds! )It’s nearly 1pm, proofs still haven’t turned up. It’s making me jittery and I may resort to nervous eating – the sales manager brought in some hot cross buns this morning. The entire office smells of warm spiced fruit bread.
(Almost as good as Apple-pie toasties!)Ahhhhh — proofs, shmoofs.
If I could do it all again, would I write a different version of
Kiwi Toasties? Possibly slightly different, possibly get hold of a better camera for the photos that I took. But I’d still be going through the same angst right now.
Maybe I’ll just pack my bags and head for Argentina, too?
Uh-oh ... Here’s the Fed-ex van ...